The weekly Le Point headlined this week: "Paris runs there? The records of the era black Delanoe. Housing was one of those records. Never
Paris will flow to its motto: "nee Fluctuat mergitur.
Instead, your bet is lost risky, Mr. Mayor, as we watch the budget for 2011.
In housing, the foundations of your policy are not healthy, and the mirage Delanoe collapses like a house of cards!
● IN THE AREA OF SOCIAL HOUSING , I would like to focus on three features of your policy, Mr. Mayor!
First, you lead a social housing policy to end pure electioneering!
Pure electioneering because v e practice a policy of posting, a political figure, it was said, the financing of 40 000 social housing units under the term of office shall be considered the net creation of 40,000 additional housing units in Paris. You probably give you a clear conscience, so that a policy that would integrate sincere effort must be focused on building and not subsidized.
Pure electioneering because you do not invest the boroughs impossible to recover from the left ( 6 th : 2.5% SRU, 7 th : 1.3% SRU , 16th: 2.5%) nor in the districts that you consider acquired the left and have yet percentages are far removed from the requirements of the SRU (9th: 4.1% 10th: 10.6% 11th: 10.9%).
And as if by chance you focus your efforts in the districts that you intend to switch to left: 17 th (10, 4%) and 15 th (14.2%).
you regularly accuse some mayors right (6 th, 7 th and 16 th ) want to hinder social housing, you hold a hypocritical because everyone knows that the borough mayor did not really have a say on social programs decided by the central city in his district.
The central city government decides everything and if it does IMPOSED not represent consensus.
So it refuses to invest in the 16 th or 7 . She says it's on the ground that prices are too high. Trivia! The price of land and real estate are no different in the 15 th and 17 th . It does not invest in the arrondissements it is unlikely to regain.
Pure electioneering c ar on behalf of the social mix, you should ask a number of district required by your friends make an effort: 2nd: 3.4%, 3rd: 5, 3%, 4 th : 8.1%. Only the central city can decide! When one aspires to teach the right, Mr. Mayor, it must be yours!
# Then, still in the park office, you are responsible for the deficiency or lack of maintenance of social housing .
In public areas, it is the policy of the patch (rehabilitation / redevelopment / renovation ....) Elevator problem / lighting / No Video / inadequate response GPIS whose scope of intervention should be broader. No investment.
# Finally, we denounce mobility and residential history down
The lack of new supply of housing directly affects the market equilibrium, the adjustment of prices and rents and their effect on the rate of effort households. This results in lengthening the average period of occupation of public housing (in cr: from 8 to 13 years between 1984 and 2006) which also means to extend the waiting period of a number important to plaintiffs.
I would like to mention the scandal of blocking trade practiced by some donors. More and more renters are sharing in our offices to discuss their difficulties in their apartment depending on changes in household size. The refusal of donors are incomprehensible when there is willingness to share big apartments smaller cons. When you know the rarity of F4 and F5, process an exchange in 3 or 4 years is outrageous. There can be adjusted between household size and dwelling size because of this mismanagement.
This failure of mobility reveals the absence of a true residential trajectory that should be offered to the Parisians, thanks to the social home ownership.
Provide access to the Parisians to social housing is good, get them out is better. The transition mechanisms are thin or nonexistent.
● ON ACCESSION social property
We say clearly that you can do better by following the path marked in particular by the government.
You spend 3% budget accommodation in the social home ownership.
You do the opposite of government that has overwhelmingly chosen to support the middle class by putting up a zero-interest loan to January 1, 2011 + no longer subject to conditions of primary resources and allows -accessing to benefit from loan amount significantly above current levels.
You persist in your conditioning Paris Housing Loan 0% to a maximum of resources. If it was not an accumulation would be possible for all between the government apparatus and the apparatus of the City. That's why the group has filed a vow UMPPA inviting the City of Paris to bring his device to homeownership on the more advantageous the government!
blue dwelling of this budget is therefore:
-swank and a lot of window dressing,
-an ounce of bad faith,
-And especially a lack of credibility on the goals that you advertise.
0 comments:
Post a Comment